+506 2216 0222 paesa@iica.int
Blog IICA

Monitoring, Evaluation and Best Practices

Data or statistical facts on the situation and perspectives of agri-food systems and the impact of policies

Evidences

83 results

Agricultural aid

03/01/2015 Go to Evidence

4% maintained Mexico in distorting aid between 2001 and 2007, below Canada (6.1%), but higher than United States (3.1%), European Union (2.9%) and Brazil (1.8%) (CEDRSSA, 2015, p. 17).

4% mantuvo México en ayudas distorsionantes entre 2001 y 2007, por debajo de Canadá (6.1%), pero superior a Estados Unidos (3.1%), la Unión Europea (2.9%) y Brasil (1.8%) (CEDRSSA, 2015, p. 17).

Macías Uribe, C. (2019). World Agricultural Trade Reform, Insertion of Mexico´s agricultural sector under NAFTA and the WTO Agreement on Agriculture, 1994-2012. Textual, 74, 13-49.

Tag: Trade&Environment Regional_Cooperation NewGenerationPolicies
Country: Brazil Canada United States Mexico European Union
Sector: Agri-Food (total) Economia, total goods
Area: Associativity International Trade and Regional Integration
Instrument: Support or subsidy for agricultural producer prices Strategies, plans, policies or guidelines; sectoral or national Studies and diagnoses Countervailing measures
Beneficiary: Agricultural producers
Result: Improved commercial competitiveness Improved market efficiency Improved public policy formulation and implementation

Climate Impact: Yield Loss in the US

06/08/2013

18% and 10% was the yield decrease in the US for corn and soybeans as a result of temperature increase in 2012 (Wescott et al., 2013).

18% y 10% fue la disminución de rendimiento en EEUU para el maíz y la soja como consecuencia del aumento de la temperatura en 2012 (Wescott et al., 2013)

Wescott P y M. Jewison. 2013. Weather Effects on Expected Corn and Soybean Yields . Washington DC: USDA Economic Research Service FDS - 13g - 01

Country: United States
Sector: Agriculture, forestry, and fishery products
Area: Regenerative and Resilient Agriculture
Beneficiary: Urban or peri-urban farmers

Agricultural subsidies

17/06/1999 Go to Evidence

In 1999, the United States granted US$132 per hectare as a corn subsidy, three times more than the US$42 per hectare granted by Mexico (Arroyo, 2009).

132 dólares por hectárea otorgaba Estados Unidos como subsidio al maíz en 1999, siendo tres veces mayor que los 42 dólares por hectárea que otorgaba México (Arroyo, 2009).

Macías Uribe, C. (2019). World Agricultural Trade Reform, Insertion of Mexico´s agricultural sector under NAFTA and the WTO Agreement on Agriculture, 1994-2012. Textual, 74, 13-49.

Tag: Trade&Environment
Country: United States Mexico
Sector: Cereals and cereal products
Area: International Trade and Regional Integration
Instrument: Support or subsidy for agricultural producer prices
Beneficiary: Value Chains Agricultural producers
Result: Improved commercial competitiveness